Property Management
September 16, 2026
I get a version of the same call every few weeks. An owner tells me their property "does okay," they haven't looked closely at the numbers in a while, and they're not sure if okay is actually good. Usually it isn't. Usually nobody's ever shown them what good looks like.
That's the gap I want to close in. This is for owners who already have one, and have a quiet feeling something's off.
If your manager is genuinely earning their fee, the rest of this post will bore you. If they're not, it'll tell you exactly where to look.
Toronto's short-term rental market went through real turbulence this year. City-wide average daily rates dropped to around $121, occupancy climbed to roughly 72%, and RevPAR is sitting near $87. A lot of the weaker, badly-run listings got filtered out by registration costs and stricter enforcement over the past year which is good news if you're one of the properties still standing, because average revenue per surviving listing is up sharply. We consistently see $165+ RevPAR against that roughly $90 city-wide average. That's the benchmark, not a brag. If your manager can't tell you your property's trailing-90-day RevPAR, ADR, and occupancy without "checking with the team," that's your first answer.
I've audited enough properties coming off other management companies to see the same patterns repeat. In no particular order:
Since late 2025, Airbnb shifted property managers off the old split-fee model (roughly 3% from the manager, 15% from the guest) onto a single bundled fee close to 15.5%, folded into the nightly rate instead of shown separately at checkout. Airbnb's position is that total cost to guests and hosts shouldn't change but it means the fee your manager charges on top of that is now the only real lever determining what you keep. If nobody's walked you through what this actually changed for your specific listing, that's worth a direct question to whoever's managing your property right now.
Most "how much can I earn on Airbnb in Toronto" content talks about Toronto like it's one market where you buy a property and list it. It isn't, and this trips up a lot of owners. Inside the City of Toronto's actual boundary, entire-unit short-term rental registration requires the property to be your principal residence. If you own it purely as an investment and don't live there, you cannot legally run it as a whole-home Airbnb inside city limits. Meanwhile, municipalities like Fort Erie explicitly license "Dedicated STRs" for non-resident owners as investment properties, just under tighter zoning rules. Thorold and parts of the wider Niagara region have their own frameworks again.
That means the map of where you can actually run a non-owner-occupied entire-home investment property in this region is a lot more specific than most content lets on. A manager who knows this cold is protecting revenue you'd otherwise lose to a fine, a forced delisting, or a property that was never eligible for what you were sold on in the first place.
The following is a composite built from patterns we see across GTA and Niagara-region properties and not a real client, but a realistic picture of what a switch-over audit typically uncovers.
A 3-bedroom detached home in Thorold, owned as a pure investment property. Under the previous manager: flat nightly rate that never moved with demand, average occupancy around 58%, no visible fee breakdown beyond "we take our cut first," and a missed municipal registration renewal that surfaced during a routine city check resulting in a fine and two weeks delisted during peak season.
After an audit and switch: dynamic pricing tied to local demand pushed occupancy to 74%, a transparent fee structure disclosed on gross revenue only, and compliance tracking that caught the next renewal 60 days out instead of after the fact. Annual revenue on the same property, same market: up roughly 35–40%, most of it from occupancy and avoided downtime rather than a higher nightly rate.
Nothing exotic happened here. It's what a manager who's actually watching the account looks like, versus one who isn't.
This is the objection I hear most, and it's mostly unfounded if it's handled properly. Existing reservations transfer, your listing keeps its review history, and a proper handover overlaps with your current manager's notice period rather than creating a gap. What it actually requires is someone willing to look at your last 90 days of numbers honestly before you commit to anything.
If you want that look send us photos of the property or your current listing link and we'll put together a real earnings assessment against what you're getting now. If the numbers say stay where you are, I'll tell you that too.